Osmanlı devleti ile İtiliaf devletleri arasında imzalanan antlaşmadır. 30 Ekim 1918'de imzalanmıştır.

Bugün, Türk ordusunun sayısız zaferlerinden birinin, 18 Mart Çanakkale Zaferi'nin 73 ncü yıldönümünü kutluyoruz. Birinci Dünya Harbi daha ilk yılını doldurmadan kazanılan bu zafer ve bu zaferi izleyen kara muharebelerinde Türk ordusunun sağladığı üstün başarı harbin akışını ve sonucunu etkilemiş, yerli, yabancı bütün askerî tarihçilerin hâlâ üzerinde önemle durdukları bir konu olmuştur. Bu mutlu yıldönümünde 73 yıl önce Çanakkale Boğazı'nda cereyan eden muharebeyi kısaca gözden geçirmek, sonuçlarını değerlendirmek ve o gün vatanları uğruna canlarını veren şehitlerimizle bugün ebediyete intikal etmiş olan gazilerimizi rahmetle, şükranla anmak için huzurunuza gelmiş bulunuyorum.

In the weekly magazine History of the First World War, of September, 1970, published in London, an article appeared under the sensational title of Genocide in Turkey by Dr. A. O. Sarkissian, an Armenian, who claims that approximately 500,000 Armenians were killed by the Turks in the last months of 1915, and that the majority of the remainder was deported to desert areas where they died of starvation or disease, at the lowest estimate 1,500,000 having died as a "direct result of a carefully-laid plan". The writer then audaciously suggests that Adolf Hitler took the treatment accorded to the Armenians as an example in ordering, on 22nd August, 1939, "the extermination of the Polish-speaking race". Dr. Sarkissian, who apparently prefers sensationalism to scholarly research, and who, being a party to the case undoubtedly has an axe to grind, has giyen an absolutely biassed account of Armenian deportations and massacres. He has failed to carry out further research connected with the subject and to consult some of the most recent publications, based on British, French, Russian, Turkish and even Armenian sources, and on the inexhaustible documents in the British Foreign Office Archives in London which throw more light on the subject. Re has preferred to write a propaganda account, rather than to produce a scholarly work, based on facts and figures, which would have been more appreciated. But then he seems to be one of the typical vociferous Armenian propagandists, some of whom, recent documents prove beyond any doubt, were themselves directly responsible for the misfortunes of the Armenian people.